You must choose your three favorite competitors in order of preference.

AS THIS IS THE CONTEST CHOSEN BY BENOIT.GUILLOT, POINTS ARE MULTIPLIED BY 1.5

The first earns 30 pts, the second 15 pts and the third 7.5 pts. You must justify your vote with a short intervention as usual. You cannot vote for yourself. PLEASE NOTE: we do not vote for one race but for one participant (2 races per participant)

Mauro : maps/tours/view/22885 + https://www.la-flamme-rouge.eu/maps/tours/view/22890 (+5 pts presentation)

benoit.guillot : maps/tours/view/22800 + https://www.la-flamme-rouge.eu/maps/tours/view/22781 (+5 pts presentation)

ChiefMasterPro : https://la-flamme-rouge.eu/maps/tours/view/22928 + https://la-flamme-rouge.eu/maps/tours/view/22927

BETTO : maps/tours/view/22909 + maps/tours/view/22910

Jekp : maps/tours/view/22930 + maps/tours/view/22914

Jostvandebeek : maps/tours/view/22933 + maps/tours/view/22913

Tank05psp : maps/tours/view/22884 + maps/tours/view/22874



VOTING ENDS MAY THE 31ST - 23H59

I can't consider the entry fo Chief and Joost because they haven't follow the instruction using the Alps for their italian race. Sorry guys

1) Jekp
I like very much your Giro di Campania and your race in Savoie and Haute Savoie is very similat to mine.

2) Mauro
I think your Pyrennes - Alps takes place in a too large region, but for the italian race we have got the same idea and I like your Giro a li Castelli

3) benoit.guillot
Good tours, cool idea the Matera stage in your Puglia - Abruzzo (even if Matera is in Basilicata )

BETTO wrote: ↑10/05/2023, 17:25 I can't consider the entry fo Chief and Joost because they haven't follow the instruction using the Alps for their italian race. Sorry guys

I interpreted the instructions that you did not need to go to the alps, but still could use them if you wanted

As for Betto, I excluded Chief and Joost of my vote for using the Alps in their italian race.

1rst : Mauro
You had the best idea making a Tour between Pyrennés and Alps ! Your italian Tour is quite good too

2nd : Betto
I think that the way you re-use same roads for your Tour de Savoie is a bit of a shame but I liked your Lazio Tour !

3rd : tank05psp
Too bad your french race is way too similar to a real Dauphiné with a lack of originality. But your two races are good enough to be on the podium.

Hi everyone!

Here are my standings for this contest 4:

1st: Mauro Your Pyrénées-Alpes tour is very interesting and well designed, congratulations! I like your Castles tour, with just a little remark: it would be better with only 5-6 stages to not be redundant.

2nd: Jekp Apart from your first stage, your Giro di Campania is well shaped. Your tour de Savoie and Haute-Savoie is well designed too, but not really original.

3rd: benoit.guillot Although i really like your Puglia - Abruzzo tour which is very nice and original, i think you put too many 4th category climb in your "Dauphiné".

Quote:

"The preparation race in Italy will not have to use an alpine summit. The stages will deliberately be more mountainous with three high-mountain stages including two summit finishes, but the rest of the race is free. The race must, however, highlight an important wine region, either by the big start or by the final finish, or both."

I don't see, why I should be excluded. Please explain to me the meaning of "not have to" , or the difference of "not have to" and "not allowed"/"must not"!

Greetings

ChiefMasterPro wrote: ↑11/05/2023, 16:37 Quote:

"The preparation race in Italy will not have to use an alpine summit. The stages will deliberately be more mountainous with three high-mountain stages including two summit finishes, but the rest of the race is free. The race must, however, highlight an important wine region, either by the big start or by the final finish, or both."

I don't see, why I should be excluded. Please explain to me the meaning of "not have to" , or the difference of "not have to" and "not allowed"/"must not"!

Greetings

You have to put that on Google Trad due to my poor english level. Sorry

Bu that seems logical to me : "you don't have to" is kind of a strange rules in the context of this contest. I mean, of course, you don't have to. Most of the time, the rules we write are made to put limits to the creations, not to tell what you can do

Here's the result of the fourth contest.

Too bad that only a few among us voted but the rules were clear so everyone who hasn't voted lost points.

1st : Mauro // 70 pts
2nd : Jekp // 35 pts
3rd : benoît.guillot // 20 pts
4th : BETTO // 15 pts
5th : Tank05psp // 7,5 pts
6th ex-aequo : ChiefMasterPro and Jostvandebeek // -10 pt

Why -10?

ChiefMasterPro wrote: ↑01/06/2023, 16:02 Why -10?

Unfortunately and if I made no mistakes you didn't vote so you lose points as we announce in the first contest of the season