Facebook login is not available anymore due to Facebook policy. If you need access to your old account send a mail with username and your actual mail.

IMPORTANT: Routing and Elevation API are limited to 7000 calls per day. In case they are expired, they won't work until limit is re-charged. You can try in this case to do a GPX on RideWithGPS site and import it on the editor

Please don't spam us mail and PMs that we won't answer and notice that the official language of forum is English.

Roadbooks: LINK

Comment with us the races in the discussion thread or in the Telegram Chat

2021 Season Contests
Contest #2: Milan - Rome and Bissagne - Guascogne - VOTING
Contest #3: Improved Spring Classic

Is Sagan the Real Tirreno - Adriatico winner?

The place where you can discuss professional road races and related results.
Post Reply
User avatar
emmea90
Vicedirettore Sportivo di terza divisione
Vicedirettore Sportivo di terza divisione
Posts: 793
Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
Location: Milano
Contact:

Is Sagan the Real Tirreno - Adriatico winner?

Post by emmea90 »

Not all times.. times are correct. This is the case of final Tirreno - Adriatico Time Trial. Can Sagan be the real race winner? Maybe.

Let's examine the following screens from a downloaded video of the race.

Depart of Sagan
Image
Video timestamp = 58'56''

Arrive of Sagan
Image
Video timestamp = 1h'10'26''

We can see from the TV graphic that Sagan has fully crossed the line in this photogram. Graphics gives Sagan a time of 11'31'', final time is 11'32''. Not only Sagan was given an extra second there, but also if you compare the timestamp you can easily see the effective time of Peter Sagan is 11'30''

Why the extra seconds? Times are calculated on start times. Start time in this case match with :55 in the video. We can see this from some start times

Brambilla, for example, at :56 has already departed
Image

But, more important, Greg Van Aevermet in on it's place with judge finishing the countdown at :55 instead of Sagan (count at one with hand)
Image

At :56, in fact, Greg Van Avermet has already departed
Image

This is where Van Avermet gain the first second as times are taken using the timestamp of departing time and arrive time. And if departing time is taken at :55, Sagan lost 1 second on its depart.

We can also see from the video that Van Aevermet crosses the line at 1:14:33
Image

Computing time is simple
Sagan:
Depart: 58:56
Arrive 1:10:26
Time: 11'30''

Van Aevermet:
Depart: 1:02:55
Arrive: 1:14:33
Time: 11'38''

There are eight seconds between Sagan and Van Avermet according to the timestamps. It's possible that video mistakes by one second, surely not by two. If we considered that RCS completely mistaked time of a Lotto-NL Jumbo rider, i am not surprised.

So, who is the real winner of Tirreno - Adriatico?
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic
User avatar
Pigna
Posts: 272
Joined: 21/09/2011, 19:40

Re: Is Sagan the Real Tirreno - Adriatico winner?

Post by Pigna »

Thanks for the article Alessio. The most serious thing is that at this point I am not surprised. Shame on you RCS, amateur races have more professional organizations. Vegni deserves the most exciting Fight for Pink of the history: Pirazzi vs Rebellin.
User avatar
Sagan99
Appassionato
Appassionato
Posts: 59
Joined: 14/08/2014, 7:15
Location: Mondo
Contact:

Re: Is Sagan the Real Tirreno - Adriatico winner?

Post by Sagan99 »

The most scandalous thing is, that in a World Tour race, RCS has not even the photocell at the start |oes
Ilnur Zakarin Greatest Fan
Post Reply