Contests are back: Link

Editor has still troubles with free API, if you don't want to use OSM Elevation API you can try to do a GPX on RideWithGPS site and import it on the editor

Please don't spam us mail and PMs that we won't answer and notice that the official language of forum is English.

Contests
Contest 6 - Voting (deadline 1/11): Link

Comment with us the races in the discussion thread or in the Telegram Chat

Suggestions

All about the stage editor: guides, releases and features.
User avatar
Pigna
Posts: 272
Joined: 21/09/2011, 19:40

Suggestions

Post by Pigna » 28/03/2016, 21:36

This site is an open-air workshop. We have many ideas , but little time to realize them.
Use this topic to propose your suggestions for the editor, the forum and everything about this site.

User avatar
tomáš.gonda
Spettatore
Posts: 11
Joined: 03/06/2016, 16:17

Re: Suggestions

Post by tomáš.gonda » 11/11/2016, 3:10

Agree with many suggestions by Linkinito, I was going to post some very similar ones in fact.
Apart from being able to filter climbs by categories and show climbs/cobbles/gravel roads on one map, I would like to be able to filter climbs by passes/dead end roads. This would require a new property for climbs and for correct functionality also setting this attribute for already created climbs. This could be fairly tedious if done one by one, so if this is implemented a mass edit function would be handy too (at least for the mods).

User avatar
emmea90
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Posts: 653
Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
Location: Milano
Contact:

Re: Suggestions

Post by emmea90 » 11/11/2016, 18:12

Why should required a New property? I Group climbs by sides in the map, if has One side is dead-end, if has more sides, not.
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic

User avatar
tomáš.gonda
Spettatore
Posts: 11
Joined: 03/06/2016, 16:17

Re: Suggestions

Post by tomáš.gonda » 11/11/2016, 19:15

I guess you could use that, but then there are climbs which end on a plateau and the other side tops far away. In any case this is not a crucial feature, just an idea I had.

User avatar
nielsboy
Spettatore
Posts: 8
Joined: 21/10/2016, 13:57

Re: Suggestions

Post by nielsboy » 12/11/2016, 12:15

Suggestion: Make it possible to create easy criteriums.
Idea: Now, I have a lot of trouble with making criteriums, because I have to do for example 20 times the same route. But can it be made possible, when a route meets the route again, to select how many time you would like to ride that route? That would be amazing to create, Crit's, WC's or NC's or a finish like at the Champs de Elysee!

User avatar
emmea90
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Posts: 653
Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
Location: Milano
Contact:

Re: Suggestions

Post by emmea90 » 12/11/2016, 17:49

nielsboy wrote:Suggestion: Make it possible to create easy criteriums.
Idea: Now, I have a lot of trouble with making criteriums, because I have to do for example 20 times the same route. But can it be made possible, when a route meets the route again, to select how many time you would like to ride that route? That would be amazing to create, Crit's, WC's or NC's or a finish like at the Champs de Elysee!
This is on working but is not easy.
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic

User avatar
nielsboy
Spettatore
Posts: 8
Joined: 21/10/2016, 13:57

Re: Suggestions

Post by nielsboy » 27/11/2016, 20:49

New suggestion: Adding a nation to Tour, like you can do with every stage now.
New suggestion: Be able to react at Tours.

User avatar
gus13
Spettatore
Posts: 1
Joined: 30/11/2016, 10:43

Re: Suggestions

Post by gus13 » 04/12/2016, 19:03

Hello,
  I am new on the site and I would have some subjjections to make:
1- Is it possible to change the size of the Start and Finish icons, or place them either left or right. (Can move them on the map)
2- When POI climbers, sprint, refueling are not fulfilled to delete the information (no green or red rectangles next to.
3- Is it possible to add a POI for the Kilometer 0, and to start the counting of the profile from this KM0 (PK0).
Thank you very much, otherwise this program is great.

User avatar
emmea90
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Posts: 653
Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
Location: Milano
Contact:

Re: Suggestions

Post by emmea90 » 04/12/2016, 22:38

1) No.
2) Right click on the POI
3) No
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic

User avatar
tomáš.gonda
Spettatore
Posts: 11
Joined: 03/06/2016, 16:17

Re: Suggestions

Post by tomáš.gonda » 05/12/2016, 21:56

Another thing which is not possible at the moment (afaik), and would be nice to have is the option to control the placing of intermediate points in stages with circuits. This is also related to the suggestion by nielsboy regarding easier creation of circuit races, which I would really appreciate if you found a way to do.

User avatar
emmea90
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Posts: 653
Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
Location: Milano
Contact:

Re: Suggestions

Post by emmea90 » 05/12/2016, 22:32

tomáš.gonda wrote:Another thing which is not possible at the moment (afaik), and would be nice to have is the option to control the placing of intermediate points in stages with circuits. This is also related to the suggestion by nielsboy regarding easier creation of circuit races, which I would really appreciate if you found a way to do.

I am working on that but at the moment is very difficult to implement. I suggest to placing them using the click on profile instead of map.
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic

User avatar
tomáš.gonda
Spettatore
Posts: 11
Joined: 03/06/2016, 16:17

Re: Suggestions

Post by tomáš.gonda » 06/12/2016, 6:49

Ah okay, I didn't know that was possible.

User avatar
julianper
Spettatore
Posts: 4
Joined: 15/02/2016, 20:43

Re: Suggestions

Post by julianper » 04/01/2017, 16:06

It would be interesting to have a general view of a tour, like Giro d'Italia
Or can see all profiles together anyway, I don't like open all one.
Image

User avatar
ale980
Spettatore
Posts: 8
Joined: 07/09/2016, 16:15
Location: Brenna (CO)

Re: Suggestions

Post by ale980 » 08/02/2017, 8:52

What do you think about a forum section where talk about our experience riding bike and/or be on road side during professional races?
Completed amateur races: Amstel Gold Race, Maratona dles Dolomites, GF Pantani (now La Campionissimo), La Pantanissima and more...

User avatar
pesallu
Appassionato
Appassionato
Posts: 60
Joined: 11/07/2016, 15:42
Contact:

Re: Suggestions

Post by pesallu » 18/04/2017, 10:26

Could you please lower the profile a little bit ? It Would be more realistic

From this level:

Fécamp > Boulogne-sur-Mer.png
Fécamp > Boulogne-sur-Mer.png (156.49 KiB) Viewed 1564 times
To this one:
2016_tour_de_france_stage2_profile2.png
2016_tour_de_france_stage2_profile2.png (121.59 KiB) Viewed 1564 times

User avatar
Chris89
Spettatore
Posts: 8
Joined: 24/03/2016, 11:41

Re: Suggestions

Post by Chris89 » 30/07/2017, 12:57

Don't know if it's been discussed, my suggestions:

1) Add the category "Rest Day" to the Editor. For example: So we can set a GT to 23 stages and can include 2 rest-day places. Would be cool to add that to the route, since it gives an impression on how the Course is designed (what logic). Don't know how difficult it would be to make it work, though.

2) I would like to have a more powerful filter or respectively a further option to filter the profile of the stages (less points, more simpler profile).

3) And I would subscribe the point of lower / raise the profile for flat or hilly stages to generate a better impression (like the person above me suggested).

My three cents. :) I get that this is a non-profit website and I assume, that you do this in your leisure time, so this is just a wish or an idea. Not a demand.

User avatar
Bomby
Spettatore
Posts: 3
Joined: 04/06/2016, 18:02

Re: Suggestions

Post by Bomby » 26/11/2017, 12:52

After the interface change I had not too much time to try it. Now, I have traced some routes and I feel uncomfortable with it, mainly because of the need to scroll the page up and down almost continuously (if I want to trace the profile, if I use streetview, if I want to insert climbanmes, sprints, or so) and for a very long extent.
Now, I don't know if this is a problem only for me, but that annoys me :roll: . The problem is mainly due to the presece of the configuration blocks on the side of the map, especially because of the ad space that occupies a lot of space. They stretch vertically the map and now is no longer possible even to draw a track without scrolling the page 59@@ . Things goes worst if I want to add intermediates. The issue is not only the scroll per se, but its extent: with the previous interface the need to scroll while editing a trace was confined and limited to a little extent; when inserting the intermediates the scrolls were necessary but they have a reasonable length. Now it is necessary to scroll as before for the intermediates only to modify a route :nana: (the google maps and editor command are never contemporarily on the same screen tafazzi ). Moreover, commands ad info windows are not close to the points of interest, and is again necessary to scroll in order to search them and check the informations :cry2: .
Will be the habit, but I prefer the previous interface. Probably there are some which like this new interface, so I do not ask you to restore the old one, but I ask you, if it is possible :63: , to give the possibility to select between old and new interface at will :ave: .
For the remaining the editor is great, the best available :beer: .

PS: I am now using a 16:9 screen in full HD resolution. Sorry for my english :oops: .

User avatar
emmea90
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Posts: 653
Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
Location: Milano
Contact:

Re: Suggestions

Post by emmea90 » 26/11/2017, 21:25

Bomby wrote:
26/11/2017, 12:52
After the interface change I had not too much time to try it. Now, I have traced some routes and I feel uncomfortable with it, mainly because of the need to scroll the page up and down almost continuously (if I want to trace the profile, if I use streetview, if I want to insert climbanmes, sprints, or so) and for a very long extent.
Now, I don't know if this is a problem only for me, but that annoys me :roll: . The problem is mainly due to the presece of the configuration blocks on the side of the map, especially because of the ad space that occupies a lot of space. They stretch vertically the map and now is no longer possible even to draw a track without scrolling the page 59@@ . Things goes worst if I want to add intermediates. The issue is not only the scroll per se, but its extent: with the previous interface the need to scroll while editing a trace was confined and limited to a little extent; when inserting the intermediates the scrolls were necessary but they have a reasonable length. Now it is necessary to scroll as before for the intermediates only to modify a route :nana: (the google maps and editor command are never contemporarily on the same screen tafazzi ). Moreover, commands ad info windows are not close to the points of interest, and is again necessary to scroll in order to search them and check the informations :cry2: .
Will be the habit, but I prefer the previous interface. Probably there are some which like this new interface, so I do not ask you to restore the old one, but I ask you, if it is possible :63: , to give the possibility to select between old and new interface at will :ave: .
For the remaining the editor is great, the best available :beer: .

PS: I am now using a 16:9 screen in full HD resolution. Sorry for my english :oops: .
There is no possibility to change the interface but the AD should not be so large, can i have some screens of what are you seeing to fix?
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic

User avatar
emmea90
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Autista dell'ammiraglia
Posts: 653
Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
Location: Milano
Contact:

Re: Suggestions

Post by emmea90 » 26/11/2017, 21:43

Ok, i found the bug, fixed. Thanks to have reporting it because i didn't saw the big AD on my
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic

User avatar
Bomby
Spettatore
Posts: 3
Joined: 04/06/2016, 18:02

Re: Suggestions

Post by Bomby » 27/11/2017, 12:11

Thanks, it is better now.

User avatar
Paganini
Allievo
Allievo
Posts: 156
Joined: 24/10/2015, 9:55

Re: Suggestions

Post by Paganini » 24/03/2018, 18:52

IMHO using the vertical names also in TDF Style, like all the other races, would be a huge improvement to the look of the profiles
Image

Post Reply