IMPORTANT: due to people using bots to scrape the website data, we have to restrict the access to the races only to people with an account. We hope that for now this will be temporay.
IMPORTANT: Routing and Elevation API are limited to 7000 calls per day. In case they are expired, they won't work until limit is re-charged. You can try in this case to do a GPX on RideWithGPS site and import it on the editor
Please don't spam us mail and PMs that we won't answer and notice that the official language of forum is English.
Comment with us the races in the Telegram Chat
New Contest Season is on: Contest 3
Follow us on Twitter: @laflammerouge16
New Feature: 3d maps - To activate it, follow this guide
IMPORTANT: Routing and Elevation API are limited to 7000 calls per day. In case they are expired, they won't work until limit is re-charged. You can try in this case to do a GPX on RideWithGPS site and import it on the editor
Please don't spam us mail and PMs that we won't answer and notice that the official language of forum is English.
Comment with us the races in the Telegram Chat
New Contest Season is on: Contest 3
Follow us on Twitter: @laflammerouge16
New Feature: 3d maps - To activate it, follow this guide
Suggestions
- Pigna
- Posts: 272
- Joined: 21/09/2011, 19:40
Suggestions
This site is an open-air workshop. We have many ideas , but little time to realize them.
Use this topic to propose your suggestions for the editor, the forum and everything about this site.
Use this topic to propose your suggestions for the editor, the forum and everything about this site.
- tomáš.gonda
- Spettatore
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 03/06/2016, 16:17
Re: Suggestions
Agree with many suggestions by Linkinito, I was going to post some very similar ones in fact.
Apart from being able to filter climbs by categories and show climbs/cobbles/gravel roads on one map, I would like to be able to filter climbs by passes/dead end roads. This would require a new property for climbs and for correct functionality also setting this attribute for already created climbs. This could be fairly tedious if done one by one, so if this is implemented a mass edit function would be handy too (at least for the mods).
Apart from being able to filter climbs by categories and show climbs/cobbles/gravel roads on one map, I would like to be able to filter climbs by passes/dead end roads. This would require a new property for climbs and for correct functionality also setting this attribute for already created climbs. This could be fairly tedious if done one by one, so if this is implemented a mass edit function would be handy too (at least for the mods).
- emmea90
- Consulente tattico Continental Tour
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
- Location: Milano
- Contact:
Re: Suggestions
Why should required a New property? I Group climbs by sides in the map, if has One side is dead-end, if has more sides, not.
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic
- tomáš.gonda
- Spettatore
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 03/06/2016, 16:17
Re: Suggestions
I guess you could use that, but then there are climbs which end on a plateau and the other side tops far away. In any case this is not a crucial feature, just an idea I had.
- nielsboy
- Spettatore
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 21/10/2016, 13:57
Re: Suggestions
Suggestion: Make it possible to create easy criteriums.
Idea: Now, I have a lot of trouble with making criteriums, because I have to do for example 20 times the same route. But can it be made possible, when a route meets the route again, to select how many time you would like to ride that route? That would be amazing to create, Crit's, WC's or NC's or a finish like at the Champs de Elysee!
Idea: Now, I have a lot of trouble with making criteriums, because I have to do for example 20 times the same route. But can it be made possible, when a route meets the route again, to select how many time you would like to ride that route? That would be amazing to create, Crit's, WC's or NC's or a finish like at the Champs de Elysee!
- emmea90
- Consulente tattico Continental Tour
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
- Location: Milano
- Contact:
Re: Suggestions
This is on working but is not easy.nielsboy wrote:Suggestion: Make it possible to create easy criteriums.
Idea: Now, I have a lot of trouble with making criteriums, because I have to do for example 20 times the same route. But can it be made possible, when a route meets the route again, to select how many time you would like to ride that route? That would be amazing to create, Crit's, WC's or NC's or a finish like at the Champs de Elysee!
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic
- nielsboy
- Spettatore
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 21/10/2016, 13:57
Re: Suggestions
New suggestion: Adding a nation to Tour, like you can do with every stage now.
New suggestion: Be able to react at Tours.
New suggestion: Be able to react at Tours.
- gus13
- Spettatore
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 30/11/2016, 10:43
Re: Suggestions
Hello,
I am new on the site and I would have some subjjections to make:
1- Is it possible to change the size of the Start and Finish icons, or place them either left or right. (Can move them on the map)
2- When POI climbers, sprint, refueling are not fulfilled to delete the information (no green or red rectangles next to.
3- Is it possible to add a POI for the Kilometer 0, and to start the counting of the profile from this KM0 (PK0).
Thank you very much, otherwise this program is great.
I am new on the site and I would have some subjjections to make:
1- Is it possible to change the size of the Start and Finish icons, or place them either left or right. (Can move them on the map)
2- When POI climbers, sprint, refueling are not fulfilled to delete the information (no green or red rectangles next to.
3- Is it possible to add a POI for the Kilometer 0, and to start the counting of the profile from this KM0 (PK0).
Thank you very much, otherwise this program is great.
- emmea90
- Consulente tattico Continental Tour
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
- Location: Milano
- Contact:
- tomáš.gonda
- Spettatore
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 03/06/2016, 16:17
Re: Suggestions
Another thing which is not possible at the moment (afaik), and would be nice to have is the option to control the placing of intermediate points in stages with circuits. This is also related to the suggestion by nielsboy regarding easier creation of circuit races, which I would really appreciate if you found a way to do.
- emmea90
- Consulente tattico Continental Tour
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
- Location: Milano
- Contact:
Re: Suggestions
tomáš.gonda wrote:Another thing which is not possible at the moment (afaik), and would be nice to have is the option to control the placing of intermediate points in stages with circuits. This is also related to the suggestion by nielsboy regarding easier creation of circuit races, which I would really appreciate if you found a way to do.
I am working on that but at the moment is very difficult to implement. I suggest to placing them using the click on profile instead of map.
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic
- tomáš.gonda
- Spettatore
- Posts: 11
- Joined: 03/06/2016, 16:17
Re: Suggestions
Ah okay, I didn't know that was possible.
- julianper
- Spettatore
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 15/02/2016, 20:43
Re: Suggestions
It would be interesting to have a general view of a tour, like Giro d'Italia
Or can see all profiles together anyway, I don't like open all one.
Or can see all profiles together anyway, I don't like open all one.
- ale980
- Spettatore
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 07/09/2016, 16:15
- Location: Brenna (CO)
Re: Suggestions
What do you think about a forum section where talk about our experience riding bike and/or be on road side during professional races?
Completed amateur races: Amstel Gold Race, Maratona dles Dolomites, GF Pantani (now La Campionissimo), La Pantanissima and more...
- pesallu
- Appassionato
- Posts: 67
- Joined: 11/07/2016, 15:42
Re: Suggestions
Could you please lower the profile a little bit ? It Would be more realistic
From this level:
To this one:
From this level:
To this one:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Chris89
- Spettatore
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 24/03/2016, 11:41
Re: Suggestions
Don't know if it's been discussed, my suggestions:
1) Add the category "Rest Day" to the Editor. For example: So we can set a GT to 23 stages and can include 2 rest-day places. Would be cool to add that to the route, since it gives an impression on how the Course is designed (what logic). Don't know how difficult it would be to make it work, though.
2) I would like to have a more powerful filter or respectively a further option to filter the profile of the stages (less points, more simpler profile).
3) And I would subscribe the point of lower / raise the profile for flat or hilly stages to generate a better impression (like the person above me suggested).
My three cents. I get that this is a non-profit website and I assume, that you do this in your leisure time, so this is just a wish or an idea. Not a demand.
1) Add the category "Rest Day" to the Editor. For example: So we can set a GT to 23 stages and can include 2 rest-day places. Would be cool to add that to the route, since it gives an impression on how the Course is designed (what logic). Don't know how difficult it would be to make it work, though.
2) I would like to have a more powerful filter or respectively a further option to filter the profile of the stages (less points, more simpler profile).
3) And I would subscribe the point of lower / raise the profile for flat or hilly stages to generate a better impression (like the person above me suggested).
My three cents. I get that this is a non-profit website and I assume, that you do this in your leisure time, so this is just a wish or an idea. Not a demand.
- Bomby
- Spettatore
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 04/06/2016, 18:02
Re: Suggestions
After the interface change I had not too much time to try it. Now, I have traced some routes and I feel uncomfortable with it, mainly because of the need to scroll the page up and down almost continuously (if I want to trace the profile, if I use streetview, if I want to insert climbanmes, sprints, or so) and for a very long extent.
Now, I don't know if this is a problem only for me, but that annoys me . The problem is mainly due to the presece of the configuration blocks on the side of the map, especially because of the ad space that occupies a lot of space. They stretch vertically the map and now is no longer possible even to draw a track without scrolling the page . Things goes worst if I want to add intermediates. The issue is not only the scroll per se, but its extent: with the previous interface the need to scroll while editing a trace was confined and limited to a little extent; when inserting the intermediates the scrolls were necessary but they have a reasonable length. Now it is necessary to scroll as before for the intermediates only to modify a route (the google maps and editor command are never contemporarily on the same screen ). Moreover, commands ad info windows are not close to the points of interest, and is again necessary to scroll in order to search them and check the informations .
Will be the habit, but I prefer the previous interface. Probably there are some which like this new interface, so I do not ask you to restore the old one, but I ask you, if it is possible , to give the possibility to select between old and new interface at will .
For the remaining the editor is great, the best available .
PS: I am now using a 16:9 screen in full HD resolution. Sorry for my english .
Now, I don't know if this is a problem only for me, but that annoys me . The problem is mainly due to the presece of the configuration blocks on the side of the map, especially because of the ad space that occupies a lot of space. They stretch vertically the map and now is no longer possible even to draw a track without scrolling the page . Things goes worst if I want to add intermediates. The issue is not only the scroll per se, but its extent: with the previous interface the need to scroll while editing a trace was confined and limited to a little extent; when inserting the intermediates the scrolls were necessary but they have a reasonable length. Now it is necessary to scroll as before for the intermediates only to modify a route (the google maps and editor command are never contemporarily on the same screen ). Moreover, commands ad info windows are not close to the points of interest, and is again necessary to scroll in order to search them and check the informations .
Will be the habit, but I prefer the previous interface. Probably there are some which like this new interface, so I do not ask you to restore the old one, but I ask you, if it is possible , to give the possibility to select between old and new interface at will .
For the remaining the editor is great, the best available .
PS: I am now using a 16:9 screen in full HD resolution. Sorry for my english .
- emmea90
- Consulente tattico Continental Tour
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
- Location: Milano
- Contact:
Re: Suggestions
There is no possibility to change the interface but the AD should not be so large, can i have some screens of what are you seeing to fix?Bomby wrote: ↑26/11/2017, 12:52 After the interface change I had not too much time to try it. Now, I have traced some routes and I feel uncomfortable with it, mainly because of the need to scroll the page up and down almost continuously (if I want to trace the profile, if I use streetview, if I want to insert climbanmes, sprints, or so) and for a very long extent.
Now, I don't know if this is a problem only for me, but that annoys me . The problem is mainly due to the presece of the configuration blocks on the side of the map, especially because of the ad space that occupies a lot of space. They stretch vertically the map and now is no longer possible even to draw a track without scrolling the page . Things goes worst if I want to add intermediates. The issue is not only the scroll per se, but its extent: with the previous interface the need to scroll while editing a trace was confined and limited to a little extent; when inserting the intermediates the scrolls were necessary but they have a reasonable length. Now it is necessary to scroll as before for the intermediates only to modify a route (the google maps and editor command are never contemporarily on the same screen ). Moreover, commands ad info windows are not close to the points of interest, and is again necessary to scroll in order to search them and check the informations .
Will be the habit, but I prefer the previous interface. Probably there are some which like this new interface, so I do not ask you to restore the old one, but I ask you, if it is possible , to give the possibility to select between old and new interface at will .
For the remaining the editor is great, the best available .
PS: I am now using a 16:9 screen in full HD resolution. Sorry for my english .
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic
- emmea90
- Consulente tattico Continental Tour
- Posts: 901
- Joined: 17/05/2011, 15:47
- Location: Milano
- Contact:
Re: Suggestions
Ok, i found the bug, fixed. Thanks to have reporting it because i didn't saw the big AD on my
Software Engineer, Cycling Fanatic
- Paganini
- Allievo
- Posts: 156
- Joined: 24/10/2015, 9:55
Re: Suggestions
IMHO using the vertical names also in TDF Style, like all the other races, would be a huge improvement to the look of the profiles